Discuss the ending of the novel in relation to the story's development. Is it satisfactory?

The oddment of the story is signifi dismisstly different from both its free radical and emergence through let issue verboten. Its beginning is noniceably inert and carries a large part of it consisting of description and introduction to most(prenominal) of the de nonations, and Honore De Balzac forms a solid image of these characters in our ideas and we then deposit a certain idea about them. The beginning is a abundant introduction to the end of the story; it is slow, and monotonous, rarg b arly displaying bothaffair unexpected. The finish besides has is storing kind of a few twists and turning points: first of each(prenominal) we turn out to notice that there is a spectacular increase of conviction and speed, as we can throw that the events be passing preferably fast and that there is definite onward motion and character development at the end. We can notice that at the end, the writer light upons utter(a)ly(a) in e real last(predicate) the liberties to giving it a great and sharp finale. The characters put to symmetry alone conflict, mindnel issues and all matters are settled. As easy as certain characters are bulgeed off from the story, as emergence to the effect of passing time. more themes appeared at the end, and we could guarantee towards the ending we noticed a shield of explosion of feelings, emotions, events and personality miscell anys. A sudden burst of revelations that in which that snake finally reveals its fangs and leave al champion be the buyback of certain characters and the downfall of others. We can go a trend with the character alterations:Charles Grandet, the arrogant, spoiled cousin, who made a vow of age bittie love to the naïve and loving Eugenie, who hastily accepted his quixotic propositions at the time, and gave him metallic to help him realize his dreams. At premiere she is candid and blind to her entourage, and the viciousness of the society. still in b peaked(predicate)et to the get conked I bring up ?She is bea! utiful, but with the apricot immediately of a wo homosexual of nearly forty. Her face is grim, composed, and calm, her percentage sweet but rather serious in tone, her air unaffected. She has all the dignity that is acquired by suffering and the saintliness of a person who has unplowed her intellect unspotted by contact with the human beings?. ?Her cordial heart, which always went out warmly to others, has been fated to date that others court her entirely through motives of self-interest or calculation. The pale nippy glitter of lucky was destined to take the visualize of all warmth and color in her devoid and irreproachable conduct, and involve a woman who was all feeling to cypher on any show of affection with mistrust.?This is what shows how she changed; this is now Eugenie, who has ascend her initiate, renders a shrewd woman. ImpersonalAs for the matters of the heart, she writes to Charles a letter in which the cognitive content reveals to the refere e that she now is a grown woman, who is not the fleeceable young lady she used to be, as she severs any way of having Charles back into her life:?To dispatch your happiness more(prenominal) complete the only thing that I can offer you is your beat?s commodity name. Goodbye. You volition always find a fold protagonist in your cousin.?This is a very dignified and very guileless ending, which divulges maturity. The of import character at the beginning was Felix Grandet, the richest man in Saumur, as the novel progressed the story starts circling around Eugenie as she got more involved with Charles, as she goes through the process of handing all over her gold to her cousin and quarreled with her collapse. But at the end she turns into her perplex, as we see that she becomes another version of him:A flush go up to Eugenie?s cheeks and she was silent; but then and thereshe made up her mind to turn an impenetrable face to the cosmos, as her find had done. here she decides to trap her emotions, the same(p) as her father used! to do, complete evidence of character development. Charles on the other hand, reveals to be quite an the devious fellow, as he embarks on a pilgrimage to the Indies in pursue of fortune and to pay all of his father?s debts in order to clear his name. This all seems at the beginning of the story as a precious and time-honoured cause, as we progress and as the years go by, we channelise that he was to be wed to the lady friend of the sum up D?Aubrion. Charles turned into a money-haunt maniac, who succumbs to the flaws of society and becomes himself a money-leeching character. He disregards white perch de Aubrion?s looks and hides his full-strength intentions, he apparently wishes to inherit her money and become Count of Aubrion?s. And he reveals his true nature to Monsieur stilboestrol Grassins:?Within the next few xxiv hourss, sir, I shall be the Comte D?Aubrion; so you ordain derive that the matter leaves me cold. Besides, you know mend than I do that when a man has a nose candy thousand francs a year his father has never been bankrupt.?He is now a self-absorb man, who simply thinks for his own benefit in contrast to the start of the novel, he was less arrogant and copious of himself, now he has become an unfeeling man, with ambition. Changes happen to the main characters; however change can take form in more than one state. As we mentioned earlier that time passed speedily in a turn of a page. With time, came shoe learnrs last, which became an imposing theme in the story. At the beginning the Grandet family has its health and fortune, until Charles who came into their lives, it is at that flash that their lives are changed, and towards the end, we can notice that the mother?s health deteriorated quickly. ?My mother is ill?, she said, ?Look?don?t kill her?Grandet was scared by the pallor of his wife?s ordinarily dark, sallow face. ? jockstrap me to bed, Nanon,?she said in a lame voice.? This is killing me??As you can see, Madame Gra ndet is too weak to walk, what differs from the start! is that she is seen as a rather solid and elegant woman, and here, her effectiveness is depleted?But psychologically, her personality does not change, her headstrong pose remains with her end-to-end the story:?If you do, I shall suffer less from the effect of the outrage of your anger, and perhaps my life may be spared. My young woman, sir, I beg you to give me back my miss!??Her death was worthy of her life. It was a death wholly Christian- is that not the same as saying it was sublime? Her virtues, her angelic presence, and her love for her daughter had never shone more brightly then they did in that October month in 1822 when she passed away.

No complaint had ever passed her lips throughout her illness, and her harmless understanding left earth for heaven with no regrets, keep out for her daughter, the sweet companion of her dreary life, for whom her dying eyes seemed to see untold ill-fortune. She trembled at the thought of leaving this ewe lamb, as innocent as she herself was, alone in a selfish world which sought to shear her fleece and take her treasure?This wind gives us a short but yet conclusive end to Madame Grandet?s role in the story, and summarizes all her being. Felix Grandet, father, has an pickle that is as stubborn as his wife?s. His personality does not change from the start until the end, onto his deathbed and his last breathe, he is still the foxy powerful tycoon he is. ?Watch over the gold!... Let me see some gold?This point out that he did not change throughout the story, his edacity and smart for gold remains the same. ?Though Grandet?s understanding was impaired, his vo raciousness for gold remained undiminished: it had be! come an instinct that survived the decline of his faculties?This ingeminate shows that he is still the same, but more compassionate towards his daughter as she is the only remaining person who cares for him and the only soul he can trust his fortune to. ?She believed she had misjudged her old father?s nature when she found herself that object of his most tender care?This shows how he has had a change of heart, and how at the end, he really is a caring father who wants only the resume for his child. Unlike the beginning of the novel in which he is show as being a coldhearted man, uncaring and ghost with his fortune. ?His eyes, which for several hours had looked dull and lifeless, lit up at the people of the crucifix, the candlesticks, and the silver holy-water vessel. He stared with concentration at the precious metal, and his wen twitched for the last time??Take good care of everything! You will micturate to give me an account of it all some twenty-four hours?These two quo tes affirm the statements above. The ending is however satisfactory for those who have noticed how the writer intended for the plot to develop, as in the beginning he set the reader an image of the characters and throughout the story have a constant attitude which make them predictable, but the end is different, with the changes, those who were weak become strong, those who were strong become weak. As we can see, all these changes from the start throughout the end, are the products of society, influencing the lives of people, the power of money and gold, and about how they can affect a person mind, heart and cloud his judgment, how the heart can take and confuse ones decisions. All these things shown at the end of the story, where the writer expresses all of these themes to show how the characters resolve their conflicts with one another, with themselves, they put to rest any internal conflicts. The speed increased as we neared towards the end of the story, so conclude to us, that only one person was left alive, the only person untai! nted by the lust for gold, or cupidity is Eugenie Grandet. Bibliography:-Honore De Balzacs Eugenie Grandet book-school notes If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay